Skip to content
Carbon Verification Limited home

Who carries the risk

Your name is on the numbers.

Carbon figures are now signed off, published and relied on like financial data. Independent verification gives the people responsible for them an expert second check, and a documented record that reasonable care was taken.

Plainly put

Responsibility stays with you. Verification shows you took care.

Your organisation prepares its emissions inventory and remains responsible for it. Verification does not move that responsibility to us.

What verification does is test your figures against the standards, record what was checked and what was found, and give you the chance to correct problems before anything is published. That record is what you can point to when someone asks how the numbers were checked.

Who is exposed

Two roles carry most of the risk.

Directors and finance directors

Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) figures sit in the directors’ report, which the board approves. Under section 463 of the Companies Act 2006, directors can be liable to the company for statements in that report they knew were untrue or misleading, or made recklessly. Where pay or long-term incentives are linked to carbon targets, a misstated baseline can mean rewards calculated on the wrong number, and clawback. When the audit committee asks “who checked this?”, a verification statement is the answer. Commissioning it is also the strongest backing you can give the team that prepares the figures.

Sustainability and energy managers

You prepare the figures, and your credibility rests on them. Carbon accounting asks one person to be expert in boundaries, emission factors, Scope 2 methods and all 15 Scope 3 categories, while the standards themselves change every year. If an error comes to light after publication, it is your judgement that is questioned, along with the bonus, promotion or reputation that depends on it. The free readiness review makes sure anything we find comes to you first, privately, while you can still put it right.

Where it goes wrong

The mistakes are easy to make and hard to see from the inside.

None of these are carelessness. We find them in footprints built by experienced, careful teams, because inventories are complex, data comes from many people, and factors and guidance change every year. A footprint that was right when it was built can be out of date a year later. These are the 30 errors we find most often, and how often we find them in an organisation’s first verified inventory.

60%

of first-time inventories we verify

F-gas records incomplete or unreliable

55%

of first-time inventories we verify

Estimates not quantified or disclosed

50%

of first-time inventories we verify

Spend factors not adjusted for price year or currency

Boundaries

  • Operational control misread

    15%

    A building the company operates is reported as Scope 3 because the landlord pays the electricity bill

    We check: Operational control tested site by site, not by who pays the bill

    Sometimes material
  • Sites or entities missing or counted twice

    20%

    Leased sites, subsidiaries or joint ventures left out, or included in two entities' figures

    We check: The entity and site list against the consolidation approach

    Sometimes material
  • Acquisitions and disposals not reflected

    15%

    Part-year ownership not pro-rated, and the base year not recalculated

    We check: Structural changes and the base-year recalculation policy

    Often material

Gases and completeness

  • Biomass and bioenergy reported as zero

    25%

    Energy sold as “zero carbon” is zero CO2 only; methane and nitrous oxide from combustion are missed

    We check: Methane and nitrous oxide included, and biogenic CO2 reported separately

    Sometimes material
  • F-gas records incomplete or unreliable

    60%

    Missing top-up logs or engineer reports, or leakage assumed to be zero

    We check: Service records and refrigerant top-ups for each system

    Sometimes material
  • Minor fuels and sources missing

    30%

    Generators, LPG, heating oil or process emissions left out

    We check: Completeness of sources against each site's activities

    Rarely material
  • Upstream energy omitted

    20%

    Well-to-tank and transmission and distribution losses missing from Scope 3

    We check: Coverage of Scope 3 category 3

    Often material

Emission factors

  • Out-of-date factors

    35%

    Factors from a previous year applied to this year's activity

    We check: Factor year and version against the reporting period

    Sometimes material
  • Unofficial factor sources

    25%

    Factors from websites, software defaults or unreferenced sources

    We check: Traceability to recognised published sources

    Sometimes material
  • UK spend factors applied overseas

    30%

    UK spend-based factors used for overseas purchases or operations

    We check: Geographic match between each factor and the activity

    Often material
  • Spend factors not adjusted for price year or currency

    50%

    Current spend applied to factors from a different price year or currency

    We check: Inflation and currency adjustment

    Often material
  • Gross and net calorific value mixed

    20%

    Fuel energy on one calorific basis and the factor on the other

    We check: The calorific basis of the activity data and the factor

    Sometimes material
  • Wrong unit conversions

    10%

    Errors converting between litres, kilograms, cubic metres, kWh and therms

    We check: Recalculation of every conversion

    Often material
  • Supplier factors including other emissions

    15%

    Supplier-specific factors that already include downstream or other-scope emissions, so they are counted twice

    We check: The boundary of each supplier-specific factor

    Sometimes material

Scope 2

  • No location-based figure

    30%

    Only market-based Scope 2 reported

    We check: Both location-based and market-based figures reported

    Often material
  • Unsupported renewable claims

    20%

    Green tariffs claimed without qualifying certificates such as REGOs, or no residual mix applied

    We check: Contractual instruments against the Scope 2 quality criteria

    Often material

Travel and transport

  • Flights reported as CO2 only

    45%

    Travel company reports omit other gases and the radiative forcing uplift

    We check: The factor basis, and disclosure of the radiative forcing choice

    Sometimes material
  • Electric vehicles reported as zero

    30%

    EV taxis or cars reported as zero emissions, ignoring the electricity used

    We check: Electricity-based factors for EV travel

    Rarely material
  • Grey fleet and mileage gaps

    15%

    Mileage claims missing, or default vehicle types applied to known vehicles

    We check: Mileage records and vehicle-specific factors

    Sometimes material

Scope 3

  • Offsets netted off

    10%

    Suppliers or the organisation deduct offsets, often of doubtful quality, from reported emissions

    We check: Gross emissions reported, with offsets disclosed separately

    Often material
  • Commuting cut without homeworking added

    30%

    Lower commuting claimed, but the emissions from more homeworking are missing

    We check: Commuting and homeworking assessed together

    Rarely material
  • Double counting between categories

    20%

    For example, freight counted in purchased goods spend and again in transport

    We check: Allocation of each activity to one category

    Sometimes material

Calculations and data

  • Spreadsheet formula errors

    40%

    COUNT used instead of SUM, inserted rows outside totals, broken links

    We check: Recalculation of totals from source data

    Sometimes material
  • Data periods misaligned

    45%

    Invoices or meter reads that do not match the reporting year, or estimated bills never corrected

    We check: Period alignment and accruals

    Sometimes material
  • Transcription errors

    30%

    Figures copied wrongly from bills, meters or supplier reports

    We check: A sample traced back to source documents

    Sometimes material
  • Estimates not quantified or disclosed

    55%

    Estimates and extrapolations used without stating their size or method

    We check: The share of estimated data and how it is disclosed

    Sometimes material

Method and documentation

  • Methodology too vague to reconstruct

    30%

    Another person could not rebuild the footprint from the methodology

    We check: Re-performance of the calculation from the methodology

    Sometimes material
  • No audit trail

    35%

    Reported figures cannot be traced back to invoices, meter reads or records

    We check: Tracing from each total back to source

    Sometimes material
  • Exclusions not justified

    40%

    Sources excluded as immaterial without assessment or disclosure

    We check: The rationale and estimated size of each exclusion

    Sometimes material
  • Inconsistent methods year to year

    25%

    Methods changed without restating the prior year or disclosing the change

    We check: Consistency with the prior year and restatement

    Sometimes material

Found in is the share of first-time verifications in which we found the error. When found shows how often it changed the reported total by a material amount. Many errors are small on their own; several together can still be material.

A moving target

Keeping up with carbon accounting is our full-time job. It shouldn’t have to be yours.

  • The GHG Protocol is revising its corporate standards, including its Scope 2 and Scope 3 guidance. GHG Protocol update process
  • Its Actions and Market Instruments work will change how market-based claims and actions beyond the inventory are reported.
  • The GHG Protocol and ISO have announced a partnership to develop unified carbon accounting standards. ESG Today report
  • Customer and scheme requirements, from CDP scoring to PPN 006 Carbon Reduction Plans, are updated regularly.

Independent GHG verification is all we do. Each verification is carried out against the requirements that apply to your reporting period, and we tell you about coming changes that will affect your next report.

Free readiness review

We find it. You fix it. The board sees the verified result.

Commissioning verification can feel like inviting someone to mark your homework. If something is wrong, the person who built the footprint feels exposed, and that puts many organisations off getting the assurance they need. So when you commission verification, we start with a free, private readiness review, working alongside the people who prepared the figures.

Private

The findings go only to you. Nobody else sees them unless you choose to share them.

Your work, your credit

We explain what needs strengthening and the requirement behind it. Your team makes the corrections, so the improved footprint is your work.

A clean record

Points you resolve at this stage do not appear in your verification statement or findings report. Formal verification covers the final figures you submit.

By the time the figures reach the board, the annual report or a customer, they have already been tested, and the people who prepared them can say so. The review is not built into your fee, and there is no multi-year contract. How the free readiness review works

Start with a 20-minute conversation.

Tell us why you report, which scopes you need verified and when you need the statement. You do not need a finished inventory. We will explain how your free readiness review and verification would work.

No obligation